Why is Watch 102 better than Band 10?
- Screen size1.83″ vs 1.47″+24%
- Battery capacity250 mAh vs 180 mAh+39%
Why is Band 10 better than Watch 102?
- Battery life (smartwatch mode)4 days vs 8 days2×
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Case size | — | 43 mm |
| Weight | — | 15 g |
| Thickness | — | 9 mm |
| Height | — | 43.4 mm |
| Width | — | 24.9 mm |
| Strap material | Silikon | Fluorelastomer |
| Water resistance | — | 5 ATM |
| Water rating (maker) | — | 50 m / 5 bar / 5 ATM |
| Colours | Black | Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.83″ | 1.47″ |
| Display technology | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| AMOLED / OLED display | Yes | Yes |
| Always-on display | — | Yes |
| Touchscreen | — | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | — | 194 px |
| Resolution (height) | — | 368 px |
| Battery | ||
| Battery life (smartwatch mode) | 4 days | 8 days |
| Battery capacity | 250 mAh | 180 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Po |
| Wireless charging | — | Yes |
| Charging | — | kabellos, magnetische Ladeschale |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | Yes | Yes |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | Yes | Yes |
| Sleep tracking | — | Yes |
| Sensors | heart rate, SpO2, accelerometer | heart rate, SpO2, accelerometer, ambient light |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | Yes | — |
| Satellite systems | GPS | — |
| Compass | — | Yes |
| Multisport / triathlon mode | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5 |
| Platform | ||
| Works with | — | iOS, Android |
