NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Balance 3 vs Cheetah 2 Ultra

Amazfit Balance 3 vs Amazfit Cheetah 2 Ultra

What Balance 3 does better (2) and where Cheetah 2 Ultra wins (4) — every spec side by side.

Amazfit Balance 3
Amazfit · 2026Balance 3
9.6Score
2 advantages≈ $370
Higher score
vs
Amazfit Cheetah 2 Ultra
Amazfit · 2026Cheetah 2 Ultra
9.4Score
4 advantages≈ $600
8.6Display8.8
9.4Battery life9.7
5.0Health tracking4.9
9.4Sports & outdoor9.6
5.2Smart features4.1
9.5Build & durability5.0
Dimensions

Size comparison

Balance 3Cheetah 2 Ultra
51.4 × 51.412.547.4 × 47.413.3
Balance 3Cheetah 2 UltraDifference
Height51.4 mm47.4 mm+4 mm
Width51.4 mm47.4 mm+4 mm
Thickness12.5 mm13.3 mm−0.8 mm
Weight62 g52 g+10 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Balance 3 better than Cheetah 2 Ultra?

  1. Water resistance10 ATM vs 5 ATM2×
  2. Thickness12.5 mm vs 13.3 mm+6%

Why is Cheetah 2 Ultra better than Balance 3?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)21 days vs 30 days+43%
  2. Weight62 g vs 52 g+19%
  3. GPS battery life (dual-band)41 h vs 60 h+46%
  4. Battery capacity658 mAh vs 780 mAh+19%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare