NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Bip 5 vs Galaxy Watch FE

Amazfit Bip 5 vs Samsung Galaxy Watch FE

What Bip 5 does better (4) and where Galaxy Watch FE wins (4) — every spec side by side.

Amazfit Bip 5
Amazfit · 2023Bip 5
5.9Score
4 advantages≈ $90
vs
Samsung Galaxy Watch FE
Samsung · 2024Galaxy Watch FE
8.3Score
4 advantages≈ $110
Higher score
4.2Display5.9
5.0Health tracking5.0
Dimensions

Size comparison

Bip 5Galaxy Watch FE
45.9 × 38.111.239.3 × 40.49.8
Bip 5Galaxy Watch FEDifference
Height38.1 mm40.4 mm−2.3 mm
Width45.9 mm39.3 mm+6.6 mm
Thickness11.2 mm9.8 mm+1.4 mm
Weight26 g27 g−1 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Bip 5 better than Galaxy Watch FE?

  1. Screen size1.91″ vs 1.2″+59%
  2. Voice assistantYes · Galaxy Watch FE: Yes
  3. Weight26 g vs 26.6 g+2%
  4. Battery capacity300 mAh vs 247 mAh+21%

Why is Galaxy Watch FE better than Bip 5?

  1. AMOLED / OLED displayNo · Bip 5: Yes
  2. Pixel density260 ppi vs 330 ppi+27%
  3. Resolution (width)320 px vs 396 px+24%
  4. Thickness11.2 mm vs 9.8 mm+14%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare