NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Bip 6 vs Bip Max

Amazfit Bip 6 vs Amazfit Bip Max

What Bip 6 does better (2) and where Bip Max wins (8) — every spec side by side.

Amazfit Bip 6
Amazfit · 2025Bip 6
9.5Score
2 advantages≈ $80
vs
Amazfit Bip Max
Amazfit · 2026Bip Max
9.5Score
8 advantages≈ $100
Higher score
7.7Display9.6
9.0Battery life9.2
5.0Health tracking5.0
9.6Sports & outdoor9.8
5.3Smart features5.3
8.9Build & durability3.4
Dimensions

Size comparison

Bip 6Bip Max
46.3 × 40.210.449.5 × 49.510.9
Bip 6Bip MaxDifference
Case size46.3 mm49.5 mm−3.2 mm
Thickness10.4 mm10.9 mm−0.5 mm
Weight28 g53 g−25 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Bip 6 better than Bip Max?

  1. Weight27.9 g vs 52.6 g+89%
  2. Thickness10.4 mm vs 10.9 mm+5%

Why is Bip Max better than Bip 6?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)14 days vs 20 days+43%
  2. GPS battery life32 h vs 40 h+25%
  3. Peak brightness2,000 nits vs 3,000 nits+50%
  4. Screen size1.97″ vs 2.07″+5%
  5. Battery capacity340 mAh vs 550 mAh+62%
  6. Resolution (width)390 px vs 432 px+11%
  7. Pixel density302 ppi vs 324 ppi+7%
  8. Sport profiles140 vs 150+7%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare