NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Bip 6 vs Cheetah 2 Pro

Amazfit Bip 6 vs Amazfit Cheetah 2 Pro

What Bip 6 does better (4) and where Cheetah 2 Pro wins (6) — every spec side by side.

Amazfit Bip 6
Amazfit · 2025Bip 6
9.5Score
4 advantages≈ $80
Higher score
vs
Amazfit Cheetah 2 Pro
Amazfit · 2026Cheetah 2 Pro
7.6Score
6 advantages≈ $450
7.7Display8.7
9.0Battery life5.6
9.6Sports & outdoor9.6
5.3Smart features8.8
8.9Build & durability5.2
Dimensions

Size comparison

Bip 6Cheetah 2 Pro
46.3 × 40.210.448 × 4813.2
Bip 6Cheetah 2 ProDifference
Height40.2 mm48 mm−7.8 mm
Width46.3 mm48 mm−1.7 mm
Thickness10.4 mm13.2 mm−2.8 mm
Weight28 g46 g−18 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Bip 6 better than Cheetah 2 Pro?

  1. GPS battery life32 h vs 26 h+23%
  2. Weight27.9 g vs 45.6 g+63%
  3. Screen size1.97″ vs 1.32″+49%
  4. Thickness10.4 mm vs 13.2 mm+26%

Why is Cheetah 2 Pro better than Bip 6?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)14 days vs 20 days+43%
  2. Peak brightness2,000 nits vs 3,000 nits+50%
  3. Battery capacity340 mAh vs 540 mAh+59%
  4. Sport profiles140 vs 170+21%
  5. Resolution (width)390 px vs 466 px+19%
  6. Pixel density302 ppi vs 353 ppi+17%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare