NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Bip 6 vs CMF Watch 3 Pro

Amazfit Bip 6 vs Nothing CMF Watch 3 Pro

What Bip 6 does better (5) and where CMF Watch 3 Pro wins (3) — every spec side by side.

Amazfit Bip 6
Amazfit · 2025Bip 6
9.5Score
5 advantages≈ $80
Higher score
vs
Nothing CMF Watch 3 Pro
Nothing · 2025CMF Watch 3 Pro
6.0Score
3 advantages≈ $75
7.7Display5.0
5.0Health tracking5.0
9.6Sports & outdoor8.0
5.3Smart features4.8
Dimensions

Size comparison

Bip 6CMF Watch 3 Pro
46.3 × 40.210.447 × 4714.4
Bip 6CMF Watch 3 ProDifference
Height40.2 mm47 mm−6.8 mm
Width46.3 mm47 mm−0.7 mm
Thickness10.4 mm14.4 mm−4 mm
Weight28 g51 g−23 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Bip 6 better than CMF Watch 3 Pro?

  1. Peak brightness2,000 nits vs 650 nits3.1×
  2. Weight27.9 g vs 51 g+83%
  3. Battery life (smartwatch mode)14 days vs 13 days+8%
  4. Screen size1.97″ vs 1.43″+38%
  5. Thickness10.4 mm vs 14.4 mm+38%

Why is CMF Watch 3 Pro better than Bip 6?

  1. Resolution (width)390 px vs 466 px+19%
  2. Pixel density302 ppi vs 326 ppi+8%
  3. Battery capacity340 mAh vs 350 mAh+3%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare