NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Bip 6 vs Watch 5

Amazfit Bip 6 vs Vivo Watch 5

What Bip 6 does better (5) and where Watch 5 wins (3) — every spec side by side.

Amazfit Bip 6
Amazfit · 2025Bip 6
9.5Score
5 advantages≈ $80
Higher score
vs
Vivo Watch 5
Vivo · 2025Watch 5
8.5Score
3 advantages≈ $110
7.7Display6.5
5.0Health tracking5.0
5.3Smart features8.3
8.9Build & durability8.0
Dimensions

Size comparison

Bip 6Watch 5
46.3 × 40.210.445 × 4511.4
Bip 6Watch 5Difference
Height40.2 mm45 mm−4.8 mm
Width46.3 mm45 mm+1.3 mm
Thickness10.4 mm11.4 mm−1 mm
Weight28 g32 g−4 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Bip 6 better than Watch 5?

  1. Screen size1.97″ vs 1.43″+38%
  2. Peak brightness2,000 nits vs 1,500 nits+33%
  3. SpeakerYes · Watch 5: No
  4. Weight27.9 g vs 32 g+15%
  5. Thickness10.4 mm vs 11.4 mm+9%

Why is Watch 5 better than Bip 6?

  1. Battery capacity340 mAh vs 505 mAh+49%
  2. Resolution (width)390 px vs 466 px+19%
  3. Pixel density302 ppi vs 326 ppi+8%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare