NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Bip Max vs T-Rex 2

Amazfit Bip Max vs Amazfit T-Rex 2

What Bip Max does better (4) and where T-Rex 2 wins (5) — every spec side by side.

Amazfit Bip Max
Amazfit · 2026Bip Max
9.5Score
4 advantages≈ $100
vs
Amazfit T-Rex 2
Amazfit · 2022T-Rex 2
9.5Score
5 advantages≈ $190
Higher score
9.6Display8.0
9.2Battery life7.9
5.0Health tracking4.9
9.8Sports & outdoor9.6
3.4Build & durability8.5
Dimensions

Size comparison

Bip MaxT-Rex 2
49.5 × 49.510.947.1 × 47.113.6
Bip MaxT-Rex 2Difference
Case size49.5 mm47.1 mm+2.4 mm
Thickness10.9 mm13.6 mm−2.7 mm
Weight53 g66 g−14 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Bip Max better than T-Rex 2?

  1. Screen size2.07″ vs 1.39″+49%
  2. Weight52.6 g vs 66.5 g+26%
  3. Thickness10.9 mm vs 13.6 mm+25%
  4. Battery capacity550 mAh vs 500 mAh+10%

Why is T-Rex 2 better than Bip Max?

  1. Water resistance5 ATM vs 10 ATM2×
  2. Battery life (smartwatch mode)20 days vs 24 days+20%
  3. GPS battery life40 h vs 50 h+25%
  4. Sport profiles150 vs 158+5%
  5. Resolution (width)432 px vs 454 px+5%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare