Dimensions
Size comparison
T-Rex 2GBD-300
| T-Rex 2 | GBD-300 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Case size | 47.1 mm | 49 mm | −1.9 mm |
| Thickness | 13.6 mm | 14.9 mm | −1.2 mm |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is T-Rex 2 better than GBD-300?
- AMOLED / OLED displayYes · GBD-300: No
- Thickness13.6 mm vs 14.9 mm+9%
Why is GBD-300 better than T-Rex 2?
- Water resistance10 ATM vs 20 ATM2×
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Case size | 47 mm | 49 mm |
| Weight | 66.5 g | — |
| Thickness | 13.6 mm | 14.9 mm |
| Height | 47.1 mm | — |
| Width | 47.1 mm | — |
| Case material | Plastic / polymer | Plastic / polymer |
| Lens / cover glass | Glass material | Mineralglas Mineralglas |
| Strap material | — | Kunststoff, Resin |
| Water resistance | 10 ATM | 20 ATM |
| Water rating (maker) | — | 200 m / 20 bar / 20 ATM |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.39″ | — |
| Display technology | AMOLED | LCD |
| Panel | AMOLED | LED |
| AMOLED / OLED display | Yes | No |
| Touchscreen | Yes | — |
| Resolution (width) | 454 px | — |
| Resolution (height) | 454 px | — |
| Pixel density | 326 ppi | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery life (smartwatch mode) | 24 days | — |
| GPS battery life | 50 h | — |
| GPS battery life (dual-band) | 26 h | — |
| Battery capacity | 500 mAh | — |
| Charging | Magnetic 2-pin pogo pin | — |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | Yes | — |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | Yes | — |
| Sleep tracking | Yes | — |
| Sensors | — | accelerometer |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | Yes | — |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | — |
| Barometric altimeter | Yes | — |
| Compass | Yes | — |
| Sport profiles | 158 | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Bluetooth | 5 | 4 |
| Platform | ||
| Platform | Proprietary | — |
