NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Cheetah 2 Pro vs T-Rex Ultra 2

Amazfit Cheetah 2 Pro vs Amazfit T-Rex Ultra 2

What Cheetah 2 Pro does better (3) and where T-Rex Ultra 2 wins (8) — every spec side by side.

Amazfit Cheetah 2 Pro
Amazfit · 2026Cheetah 2 Pro
7.6Score
3 advantages≈ $450
vs
Amazfit T-Rex Ultra 2
Amazfit · 2026T-Rex Ultra 2
9.3Score
8 advantages≈ $550
Higher score
8.7Display8.8
5.6Battery life8.2
9.6Sports & outdoor9.5
8.8Smart features4.1
5.2Build & durability7.3
Dimensions

Size comparison

Cheetah 2 ProT-Rex Ultra 2
48 × 4813.251 × 5114.3
Cheetah 2 ProT-Rex Ultra 2Difference
Height48 mm51 mm−3 mm
Width48 mm51 mm−3 mm
Thickness13.2 mm14.3 mm−1.1 mm
Weight46 g89 g−44 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Cheetah 2 Pro better than T-Rex Ultra 2?

  1. Weight45.6 g vs 89.2 g+96%
  2. Pixel density353 ppi vs 322 ppi+10%
  3. Thickness13.2 mm vs 14.3 mm+8%

Why is T-Rex Ultra 2 better than Cheetah 2 Pro?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)20 days vs 30 days+50%
  2. GPS battery life26 h vs 40 h+54%
  3. Water resistance5 ATM vs 10 ATM2×
  4. Screen size1.32″ vs 1.5″+14%
  5. GPS battery life (dual-band)31 h vs 50 h+61%
  6. Battery capacity540 mAh vs 870 mAh+61%
  7. Sport profiles170 vs 180+6%
  8. Resolution (width)466 px vs 480 px+3%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare