NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Cheetah 2 Ultra vs Falcon

Amazfit Cheetah 2 Ultra vs Amazfit Falcon

What Cheetah 2 Ultra does better (7) and where Falcon wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Amazfit Cheetah 2 Ultra
Amazfit · 2026Cheetah 2 Ultra
9.4Score
7 advantages≈ $600
vs
Amazfit Falcon
AmazfitFalcon
9.6Score
2 advantages≈ $500
Higher score
8.8Display6.6
9.7Battery life5.3
9.6Sports & outdoor9.8
5.0Build & durability9.6
Dimensions

Size comparison

Cheetah 2 UltraFalcon
47.4 × 47.413.349.4 × 47.213
Cheetah 2 UltraFalconDifference
Height47.4 mm47.2 mm+0.2 mm
Width47.4 mm49.4 mm−2.1 mm
Thickness13.3 mm13 mm+0.4 mm
Weight52 g64 g−12 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Cheetah 2 Ultra better than Falcon?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)30 days vs 14 days2.1×
  2. GPS battery life (dual-band)60 h vs 21 h2.9×
  3. Weight52 g vs 64 g+23%
  4. Screen size1.5″ vs 1.28″+17%
  5. Battery capacity780 mAh vs 500 mAh+56%
  6. Resolution (width)480 px vs 416 px+15%
  7. Sport profiles180 vs 160+12%

Why is Falcon better than Cheetah 2 Ultra?

  1. Water resistance5 ATM vs 20 ATM4×
  2. Thickness13.3 mm vs 13 mm+3%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare