NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Cheetah 2 Ultra vs T-Rex Dual Solar

Amazfit Cheetah 2 Ultra vs Amazfit T-Rex Dual Solar

What Cheetah 2 Ultra does better (7) and where T-Rex Dual Solar wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Amazfit Cheetah 2 Ultra
Amazfit · 2026Cheetah 2 Ultra
9.4Score
7 advantages≈ $600
vs
Amazfit T-Rex Dual Solar
Amazfit · 2026T-Rex Dual Solar
9.4Score
2 advantages≈ $650
Higher score
8.8Display8.7
9.7Battery life8.2
4.9Health tracking9.6
9.6Sports & outdoor9.5
4.1Smart features4.1
5.0Build & durability9.0
Dimensions

Size comparison

Cheetah 2 UltraT-Rex Dual Solar
47.4 × 47.413.351.4 × 51.414.5
Cheetah 2 UltraT-Rex Dual SolarDifference
Height47.4 mm51.4 mm−4 mm
Width47.4 mm51.4 mm−4 mm
Thickness13.3 mm14.5 mm−1.2 mm
Weight52 g69 g−17 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Cheetah 2 Ultra better than T-Rex Dual Solar?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)30 days vs 25 days+20%
  2. Weight52 g vs 69 g+33%
  3. Screen size1.5″ vs 1.32″+14%
  4. GPS battery life (dual-band)60 h vs 41 h+46%
  5. Battery capacity780 mAh vs 660 mAh+18%
  6. Thickness13.3 mm vs 14.5 mm+9%
  7. Resolution (width)480 px vs 466 px+3%

Why is T-Rex Dual Solar better than Cheetah 2 Ultra?

  1. Water resistance5 ATM vs 10 ATM2×
  2. Pixel density323 ppi vs 353 ppi+9%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare