NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Cheetah Pro vs T-Rex 3

Amazfit Cheetah Pro vs Amazfit T-Rex 3

What Cheetah Pro does better (4) and where T-Rex 3 wins (7) — every spec side by side.

Amazfit Cheetah Pro
Amazfit · 2023Cheetah Pro
7.3Score
4 advantages≈ $300
vs
Amazfit T-Rex 3
Amazfit · 2024T-Rex 3
8.4Score
7 advantages≈ $280
Higher score
9.4Display8.3
6.0Battery life6.9
9.8Sports & outdoor9.4
6.5Smart features6.5
4.5Build & durability8.4
Dimensions

Size comparison

Cheetah ProT-Rex 3
47 × 4711.848.5 × 48.513.8
Cheetah ProT-Rex 3Difference
Height47 mm48.5 mm−1.5 mm
Width47 mm48.5 mm−1.5 mm
Thickness11.8 mm13.8 mm−1.9 mm
Weight34 g68 g−34 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Cheetah Pro better than T-Rex 3?

  1. GPS battery life44 h vs 28 h+57%
  2. Weight34 g vs 68.3 g2×
  3. Thickness11.8 mm vs 13.8 mm+17%
  4. Pixel density331 ppi vs 322 ppi+3%

Why is T-Rex 3 better than Cheetah Pro?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)14 days vs 27 days+93%
  2. Water resistance5 ATM vs 10 ATM2×
  3. Screen size1.45″ vs 1.5″+3%
  4. Battery saver mode24 days vs 40 days+67%
  5. GPS battery life (dual-band)26 h vs 42 h+62%
  6. Battery capacity440 mAh vs 700 mAh+59%
  7. Sport profiles156 vs 170+9%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare