NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Cheetah Square vs Pace Pro

Amazfit Cheetah Square vs Coros Pace Pro

What Cheetah Square does better (5) and where Pace Pro wins (4) — every spec side by side.

Amazfit Cheetah Square
Amazfit · 2023Cheetah Square
5.4Score
5 advantages≈ $230
vs
Coros Pace Pro
5.9Score
4 advantages≈ $300
Higher score
9.5Display5.0
2.2Battery life7.0
9.7Sports & outdoor3.8
4.6Build & durability2.7
Dimensions

Size comparison

Cheetah SquarePace Pro
44 × 38.79.946 × 4612.2
Cheetah SquarePace ProDifference
Height38.7 mm46 mm−7.3 mm
Width44 mm46 mm−2 mm
Thickness9.9 mm12.2 mm−2.3 mm
Weight25 g49 g−24 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Cheetah Square better than Pace Pro?

  1. Weight25 g vs 49 g+96%
  2. Sport profiles150 vs 285.4×
  3. Screen size1.75″ vs 1.3″+35%
  4. Thickness9.9 mm vs 12.2 mm+24%
  5. Pixel density341 ppi vs 320 ppi+7%

Why is Pace Pro better than Cheetah Square?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)8 days vs 20 days2.5×
  2. GPS battery life20 h vs 38 h+90%
  3. GPS battery life (dual-band)13 h vs 31 h2.4×
  4. Resolution (width)390 px vs 416 px+7%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare