NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. T-Rex 3 Pro vs Nomad

Amazfit T-Rex 3 Pro vs Coros Nomad

What T-Rex 3 Pro does better (11) and where Nomad wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Amazfit T-Rex 3 Pro
Amazfit · 2025T-Rex 3 Pro
9.6Score
11 advantages≈ $400
Higher score
vs
Coros Nomad
Coros · 2025Nomad
5.3Score
1 advantage≈ $350
9.7Display3.8
9.0Battery life7.9
9.6Health tracking4.9
9.5Sports & outdoor5.2
8.6Build & durability2.3
Dimensions

Size comparison

T-Rex 3 ProNomad
48 × 481447.8 × 47.814.8
T-Rex 3 ProNomadDifference
Height48 mm47.8 mm+0.2 mm
Width48 mm47.8 mm+0.2 mm
Thickness14 mm14.8 mm−0.8 mm
Weight74 g61 g+14 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is T-Rex 3 Pro better than Nomad?

  1. GPS battery life85 h vs 50 h+70%
  2. Water resistance10 ATM vs 5 ATM2×
  3. AMOLED / OLED displayYes · Nomad: No
  4. Battery life (smartwatch mode)25 days vs 22 days+14%
  5. Sport profiles180 vs 434.2×
  6. Pixel density466 ppi vs 200 ppi2.3×
  7. Sapphire crystalYes · Nomad: No
  8. Screen size1.5″ vs 1.3″+15%
  9. Resolution (width)480 px vs 260 px+85%
  10. GPS battery life (dual-band)38 h vs 34 h+12%
  11. Thickness14 mm vs 14.8 mm+6%

Why is Nomad better than T-Rex 3 Pro?

  1. Weight74.5 g vs 61 g+22%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare