NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. T-Rex Dual Solar vs Pace 4 Pro

Amazfit T-Rex Dual Solar vs Coros Pace 4 Pro

What T-Rex Dual Solar does better (5) and where Pace 4 Pro wins (3) — every spec side by side.

Amazfit T-Rex Dual Solar
Amazfit · 2026T-Rex Dual Solar
9.4Score
5 advantages≈ $650
Higher score
vs
Coros Pace 4 Pro
Coros · 2026Pace 4 Pro
8.2Score
3 advantages≈ $450
8.7Display8.4
8.2Battery life8.3
9.6Health tracking4.9
9.5Sports & outdoor4.2
4.1Smart features6.5
9.0Build & durability5.0
Dimensions

Size comparison

T-Rex Dual SolarPace 4 Pro
51.4 × 51.414.547.6 × 47.611.8
T-Rex Dual SolarPace 4 ProDifference
Height51.4 mm47.6 mm+3.8 mm
Width51.4 mm47.6 mm+3.8 mm
Thickness14.5 mm11.8 mm+2.7 mm
Weight69 g51 g+18 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is T-Rex Dual Solar better than Pace 4 Pro?

  1. Water resistance10 ATM vs 5 ATM2×
  2. Battery life (smartwatch mode)25 days vs 21 days+19%
  3. Sport profiles180 vs 315.8×
  4. Pixel density353 ppi vs 317 ppi+11%
  5. GPS battery life (dual-band)41 h vs 40 h+2%

Why is Pace 4 Pro better than T-Rex Dual Solar?

  1. Weight69 g vs 51 g+35%
  2. Screen size1.32″ vs 1.47″+11%
  3. Thickness14.5 mm vs 11.8 mm+23%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare