NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. T-Rex Dual Solar vs Vertix 2S

Amazfit T-Rex Dual Solar vs Coros Vertix 2S

What T-Rex Dual Solar does better (6) and where Vertix 2S wins (3) — every spec side by side.

Amazfit T-Rex Dual Solar
Amazfit · 2026T-Rex Dual Solar
9.4Score
6 advantages≈ $650
Higher score
vs
Coros Vertix 2S
Coros · 2024Vertix 2S
8.4Score
3 advantages≈ $700
8.7Display4.4
8.2Battery life9.8
9.6Health tracking4.9
9.5Sports & outdoor5.2
9.0Build & durability7.8
Dimensions

Size comparison

T-Rex Dual SolarVertix 2S
51.4 × 51.414.550.3 × 50.316
T-Rex Dual SolarVertix 2SDifference
Height51.4 mm50.3 mm+1.1 mm
Width51.4 mm50.3 mm+1.1 mm
Thickness14.5 mm16 mm−1.5 mm
Weight69 g87 g−18 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is T-Rex Dual Solar better than Vertix 2S?

  1. AMOLED / OLED displayYes · Vertix 2S: No
  2. Sport profiles180 vs 434.2×
  3. Weight69 g vs 87 g+26%
  4. Pixel density353 ppi vs 200 ppi+76%
  5. Resolution (width)466 px vs 280 px+66%
  6. Thickness14.5 mm vs 16 mm+10%

Why is Vertix 2S better than T-Rex Dual Solar?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)25 days vs 36 days+44%
  2. Screen size1.32″ vs 1.4″+6%
  3. GPS battery life (dual-band)41 h vs 43 h+5%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare