NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. T-Rex Dual Solar vs Approach S72 43mm

Amazfit T-Rex Dual Solar vs Garmin Approach S72 43mm

What T-Rex Dual Solar does better (5) and where Approach S72 43mm wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Amazfit T-Rex Dual Solar
Amazfit · 2026T-Rex Dual Solar
9.4Score
5 advantages≈ $650
Higher score
vs
Garmin Approach S72 43mm
Garmin · 2026Approach S72 43mm
6.3Score
2 advantages≈ $800
8.7Display5.0
9.6Health tracking8.3
9.5Sports & outdoor6.7
4.1Smart features3.2
9.0Build & durability5.3
Dimensions

Size comparison

T-Rex Dual SolarApproach S72 43mm
51.4 × 51.414.543 × 4312.9
T-Rex Dual SolarApproach S72 43mmDifference
Height51.4 mm43 mm+8.4 mm
Width51.4 mm43 mm+8.4 mm
Thickness14.5 mm12.9 mm+1.6 mm
Weight69 g41 g+28 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is T-Rex Dual Solar better than Approach S72 43mm?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)25 days vs 10 days2.5×
  2. Water resistance10 ATM vs 5 ATM2×
  3. Sport profiles180 vs 95+89%
  4. Resolution (width)466 px vs 416 px+12%
  5. Pixel density353 ppi vs 320 ppi+10%

Why is Approach S72 43mm better than T-Rex Dual Solar?

  1. Weight69 g vs 41 g+68%
  2. Thickness14.5 mm vs 12.9 mm+12%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare