NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. T-Rex Dual Solar vs Approach S72 47mm

Amazfit T-Rex Dual Solar vs Garmin Approach S72 47mm

What T-Rex Dual Solar does better (5) and where Approach S72 47mm wins (3) — every spec side by side.

Amazfit T-Rex Dual Solar
Amazfit · 2026T-Rex Dual Solar
9.4Score
5 advantages≈ $650
Higher score
vs
Garmin Approach S72 47mm
Garmin · 2026Approach S72 47mm
6.5Score
3 advantages≈ $800
8.7Display6.5
9.6Health tracking8.3
9.5Sports & outdoor6.7
4.1Smart features3.2
9.0Build & durability5.1
Dimensions

Size comparison

T-Rex Dual SolarApproach S72 47mm
51.4 × 51.414.547 × 4713.5
T-Rex Dual SolarApproach S72 47mmDifference
Height51.4 mm47 mm+4.4 mm
Width51.4 mm47 mm+4.4 mm
Thickness14.5 mm13.5 mm+1 mm
Weight69 g48 g+21 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is T-Rex Dual Solar better than Approach S72 47mm?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)25 days vs 16 days+56%
  2. Water resistance10 ATM vs 5 ATM2×
  3. Sport profiles180 vs 95+89%
  4. Pixel density353 ppi vs 324 ppi+9%
  5. Resolution (width)466 px vs 454 px+3%

Why is Approach S72 47mm better than T-Rex Dual Solar?

  1. Weight69 g vs 48 g+44%
  2. Screen size1.32″ vs 1.4″+6%
  3. Thickness14.5 mm vs 13.5 mm+7%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare