NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. T-Rex Dual Solar vs Race 3S

Amazfit T-Rex Dual Solar vs Suunto Race 3S

What T-Rex Dual Solar does better (2) and where Race 3S wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Amazfit T-Rex Dual Solar
Amazfit · 2026T-Rex Dual Solar
9.4Score
2 advantages≈ $650
Higher score
vs
Suunto Race 3S
Suunto · 2026Race 3S
6.6Score
2 advantages≈ $490
8.7Display7.1
9.6Health tracking4.9
9.5Sports & outdoor6.2
9.0Build & durability4.8
Dimensions

Size comparison

T-Rex Dual SolarRace 3S
51.4 × 51.414.546 × 4611.4
T-Rex Dual SolarRace 3SDifference
Height51.4 mm46 mm+5.4 mm
Width51.4 mm46 mm+5.4 mm
Thickness14.5 mm11.4 mm+3.1 mm
Weight69 g56 g+13 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is T-Rex Dual Solar better than Race 3S?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)25 days vs 12 days2.1×
  2. Water resistance10 ATM vs 5 ATM2×

Why is Race 3S better than T-Rex Dual Solar?

  1. Weight69 g vs 56 g+23%
  2. Thickness14.5 mm vs 11.4 mm+27%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare