NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. T-Rex Ultra 2 vs Pace 4 Pro

Amazfit T-Rex Ultra 2 vs Coros Pace 4 Pro

What T-Rex Ultra 2 does better (6) and where Pace 4 Pro wins (3) — every spec side by side.

Amazfit T-Rex Ultra 2
Amazfit · 2026T-Rex Ultra 2
9.3Score
6 advantages≈ $550
Higher score
vs
Coros Pace 4 Pro
Coros · 2026Pace 4 Pro
8.2Score
3 advantages≈ $450
8.8Display8.4
8.2Battery life8.3
9.6Health tracking4.9
9.5Sports & outdoor4.2
4.1Smart features6.5
7.3Build & durability5.0
Dimensions

Size comparison

T-Rex Ultra 2Pace 4 Pro
51 × 5114.347.6 × 47.611.8
T-Rex Ultra 2Pace 4 ProDifference
Height51 mm47.6 mm+3.4 mm
Width51 mm47.6 mm+3.4 mm
Thickness14.3 mm11.8 mm+2.5 mm
Weight89 g51 g+38 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is T-Rex Ultra 2 better than Pace 4 Pro?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)30 days vs 21 days+43%
  2. Water resistance10 ATM vs 5 ATM2×
  3. Sport profiles180 vs 315.8×
  4. Screen size1.5″ vs 1.47″+2%
  5. GPS battery life (dual-band)50 h vs 40 h+25%
  6. Resolution (width)480 px vs 466 px+3%

Why is Pace 4 Pro better than T-Rex Ultra 2?

  1. GPS battery life40 h vs 60 h+50%
  2. Weight89.2 g vs 51 g+75%
  3. Thickness14.3 mm vs 11.8 mm+21%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare