NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. T-Rex Ultra 2 vs Instinct 3 50mm AMOLED

Amazfit T-Rex Ultra 2 vs Garmin Instinct 3 50mm AMOLED

What T-Rex Ultra 2 does better (6) and where Instinct 3 50mm AMOLED wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Amazfit T-Rex Ultra 2
Amazfit · 2026T-Rex Ultra 2
9.3Score
6 advantages≈ $550
Higher score
vs
Garmin Instinct 3 50mm AMOLED
7.5Score
1 advantage≈ $400
8.8Display5.6
8.2Battery life7.3
9.6Health tracking4.9
9.5Sports & outdoor6.6
7.3Build & durability5.4
Dimensions

Size comparison

T-Rex Ultra 2Instinct 3 50mm AMOLED
51 × 5114.350 × 5014.4
T-Rex Ultra 2Instinct 3 50mm AMOLEDDifference
Height51 mm50 mm+1 mm
Width51 mm50 mm+1 mm
Thickness14.3 mm14.4 mm−0.1 mm
Weight89 g59 g+30 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is T-Rex Ultra 2 better than Instinct 3 50mm AMOLED?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)30 days vs 24 days+25%
  2. Sapphire crystalYes · Instinct 3 50mm AMOLED: No
  3. Screen size1.5″ vs 1.3″+15%
  4. Sport profiles180 vs 96+88%
  5. GPS battery life (dual-band)50 h vs 30 h+67%
  6. Resolution (width)480 px vs 416 px+15%

Why is Instinct 3 50mm AMOLED better than T-Rex Ultra 2?

  1. Weight89.2 g vs 59 g+51%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare