NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. T-Rex Ultra 2 vs Race 3S

Amazfit T-Rex Ultra 2 vs Suunto Race 3S

What T-Rex Ultra 2 does better (4) and where Race 3S wins (3) — every spec side by side.

Amazfit T-Rex Ultra 2
Amazfit · 2026T-Rex Ultra 2
9.3Score
4 advantages≈ $550
Higher score
vs
Suunto Race 3S
Suunto · 2026Race 3S
6.6Score
3 advantages≈ $490
8.8Display7.1
9.6Health tracking4.9
9.5Sports & outdoor6.2
7.3Build & durability4.8
Dimensions

Size comparison

T-Rex Ultra 2Race 3S
51 × 5114.346 × 4611.4
T-Rex Ultra 2Race 3SDifference
Height51 mm46 mm+5 mm
Width51 mm46 mm+5 mm
Thickness14.3 mm11.4 mm+2.9 mm
Weight89 g56 g+33 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is T-Rex Ultra 2 better than Race 3S?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)30 days vs 12 days2.5×
  2. Water resistance10 ATM vs 5 ATM2×
  3. Screen size1.5″ vs 1.32″+14%
  4. Resolution (width)480 px vs 466 px+3%

Why is Race 3S better than T-Rex Ultra 2?

  1. Weight89.2 g vs 56 g+59%
  2. Thickness14.3 mm vs 11.4 mm+25%
  3. Pixel density322 ppi vs 353 ppi+10%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare