NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. T-Rex Ultra vs Pace 4 Pro

Amazfit T-Rex Ultra vs Coros Pace 4 Pro

What T-Rex Ultra does better (2) and where Pace 4 Pro wins (7) — every spec side by side.

Amazfit T-Rex Ultra
Amazfit · 2023T-Rex Ultra
8.3Score
2 advantages≈ $400
Higher score
vs
Coros Pace 4 Pro
Coros · 2026Pace 4 Pro
8.2Score
7 advantages≈ $450
8.0Display8.4
7.2Battery life8.3
4.9Health tracking4.9
6.0Sports & outdoor4.2
6.3Build & durability5.0
Dimensions

Size comparison

T-Rex UltraPace 4 Pro
47.3 × 47.313.447.6 × 47.611.8
T-Rex UltraPace 4 ProDifference
Height47.3 mm47.6 mm−0.3 mm
Width47.3 mm47.6 mm−0.3 mm
Thickness13.4 mm11.8 mm+1.6 mm
Weight89 g51 g+38 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is T-Rex Ultra better than Pace 4 Pro?

  1. Water resistance10 ATM vs 5 ATM2×
  2. Pixel density326 ppi vs 317 ppi+3%

Why is Pace 4 Pro better than T-Rex Ultra?

  1. GPS battery life46 h vs 60 h+30%
  2. Weight89 g vs 51 g+75%
  3. Battery life (smartwatch mode)20 days vs 21 days+5%
  4. Screen size1.39″ vs 1.47″+6%
  5. GPS battery life (dual-band)28 h vs 40 h+43%
  6. Thickness13.4 mm vs 11.8 mm+14%
  7. Resolution (width)454 px vs 466 px+3%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare