NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. T-Rex Ultra vs Instinct 3 50mm AMOLED

Amazfit T-Rex Ultra vs Garmin Instinct 3 50mm AMOLED

What T-Rex Ultra does better (4) and where Instinct 3 50mm AMOLED wins (4) — every spec side by side.

Amazfit T-Rex Ultra
Amazfit · 2023T-Rex Ultra
8.3Score
4 advantages≈ $400
Higher score
vs
Garmin Instinct 3 50mm AMOLED
7.5Score
4 advantages≈ $400
8.0Display5.6
7.2Battery life7.3
4.9Health tracking4.9
6.0Sports & outdoor6.6
6.3Build & durability5.4
Dimensions

Size comparison

T-Rex UltraInstinct 3 50mm AMOLED
47.3 × 47.313.450 × 5014.4
T-Rex UltraInstinct 3 50mm AMOLEDDifference
Height47.3 mm50 mm−2.7 mm
Width47.3 mm50 mm−2.7 mm
Thickness13.4 mm14.4 mm−1 mm
Weight89 g59 g+30 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is T-Rex Ultra better than Instinct 3 50mm AMOLED?

  1. GPS battery life46 h vs 40 h+15%
  2. Screen size1.39″ vs 1.3″+7%
  3. Resolution (width)454 px vs 416 px+9%
  4. Thickness13.4 mm vs 14.4 mm+7%

Why is Instinct 3 50mm AMOLED better than T-Rex Ultra?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)20 days vs 24 days+20%
  2. Weight89 g vs 59 g+51%
  3. Battery saver mode25 days vs 30 days+20%
  4. GPS battery life (dual-band)28 h vs 30 h+7%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare