vs
5.0Display6.0
5.5Health tracking5.5
Why is VivoWatch 5 Aero HC-C05 better than Band 10?
VivoWatch 5 Aero HC-C05 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is Band 10 better than VivoWatch 5 Aero HC-C05?
- Battery life (smartwatch mode)3 days vs 8 days2.7×
- Screen size0.96″ vs 1.47″+53%
- Battery capacity140 mAh vs 180 mAh+29%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Case size | — | 43 mm |
| Weight | — | 15 g |
| Thickness | — | 9 mm |
| Height | — | 43.4 mm |
| Width | — | 24.9 mm |
| Strap material | Kunststoff | Fluorelastomer |
| Water resistance | 5 ATM | 5 ATM |
| Water rating (maker) | 5 ATM | 50 m / 5 bar / 5 ATM |
| Colours | — | Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 0.96″ | 1.47″ |
| Display technology | OLED | AMOLED |
| Panel | OLED | AMOLED |
| AMOLED / OLED display | Yes | Yes |
| Always-on display | — | Yes |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | — | 194 px |
| Resolution (height) | — | 368 px |
| Battery | ||
| Battery life (smartwatch mode) | 3 days | 8 days |
| Battery capacity | 140 mAh | 180 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Po |
| Wireless charging | — | Yes |
| Charging | magnetische Ladeschale, über USB Port | kabellos, magnetische Ladeschale |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | Yes | Yes |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | Yes | Yes |
| Sleep tracking | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | heart rate, SpO2 | heart rate, SpO2, accelerometer, ambient light |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Compass | — | Yes |
| Multisport / triathlon mode | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| Bluetooth | 4.2 | 5 |
| Platform | ||
| Works with | — | iOS, Android |
Related comparisons
vs
Fitbit Charge 6vsAsus VivoWatch 5 Aero HC-C055.66.6
vsDenver SWC-338vsAsus VivoWatch 5 Aero HC-C057.16.6
vsHaylou RS4 PlusvsAsus VivoWatch 5 Aero HC-C05
vsMaxcom Fit FW42vsAsus VivoWatch 5 Aero HC-C05
vsXiaomi Smart Band 9 ActivevsAsus VivoWatch 5 Aero HC-C055.56.6vs
Asus VivoWatch 5 Aero HC-C05vsXiaomi Smart Band 86.66.4