vs
9.4Health tracking9.8
Why is VivoWatch 5 better than Hybrid CONNECTED 20002?
- Battery capacity300 mAh vs 104 mAh2.9×
Why is Hybrid CONNECTED 20002 better than VivoWatch 5?
- AMOLED / OLED displayNo · VivoWatch 5: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Case size | — | 43 mm |
| Weight | 74 g | — |
| Lens / cover glass | — | Mineralglas Mineralglas |
| Strap material | — | Silikon |
| Water resistance | 5 ATM | 5 ATM |
| Water rating (maker) | 5 ATM | 50 m / 5 bar / 5 ATM |
| Display | ||
| Display technology | LCD | AMOLED |
| Panel | LCD | AMOLED |
| AMOLED / OLED display | No | Yes |
| Touchscreen | Yes | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery life (smartwatch mode) | 10 days | 10 days |
| Battery capacity | 300 mAh | 104 mAh |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | Yes | Yes |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | Yes | Yes |
| ECG | Yes | — |
| Skin temperature | Yes | Yes |
| Sleep tracking | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | SpO2, temperature | heart rate, SpO2, temperature, accelerometer |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite systems | GPS | GPS |
| Connectivity | ||
| LTE (cellular) | No | — |
| Bluetooth | 4.2 | 5.2 |
| Platform | ||
| Works with | iOS, Android | Android |
| Chipset | — | Single-Core |
