NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. 301 vs Pulse

Bea-Fon 301 vs Kospet Pulse

What 301 does better (0) and where Pulse wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Bea-Fon 301
Bea-Fon · 2025301
9.4Score
0 advantages≈ $45
vs
Kospet Pulse
Kospet · 2025Pulse
9.6Score
2 advantages≈ $50
Higher score
9.4Display9.7
4.9Health tracking4.9

Why is 301 better than Pulse?

301 has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Why is Pulse better than 301?

  1. Screen size1.45″ vs 1.96″+35%
  2. Battery capacity300 mAh vs 350 mAh+17%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare