vs
3.2Display9.6
4.9Health tracking4.9
Dimensions
Size comparison
BTIONWATCHPRORKPSW 300
| BTIONWATCHPRORK | PSW 300 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Case size | 35 mm | 41 mm | −6 mm |
| Thickness | 34 mm | 13 mm | +21 mm |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is BTIONWATCHPRORK better than PSW 300?
BTIONWATCHPRORK has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is PSW 300 better than BTIONWATCHPRORK?
- AMOLED / OLED displayNo · BTIONWATCHPRORK: Yes
- Thickness34 mm vs 13 mm2.6×
- Screen size1.38″ vs 1.85″+34%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Case size | 35 mm | 41 mm |
| Thickness | 34 mm | 13 mm |
| Strap material | Silikon | Silikon |
| Ingress protection | IP65 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx5 | — |
| Colours | Black | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.38″ | 1.85″ |
| Display technology | LCD | AMOLED |
| Panel | TFT | AMOLED |
| AMOLED / OLED display | No | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery life (smartwatch mode) | — | 12 days |
| Battery capacity | — | 240 mAh |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | Yes | Yes |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | Yes | Yes |
| Sleep tracking | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | heart rate | heart rate, SpO2 |
| Platform | ||
| Operating system | Proprietär | — |
| Platform | Proprietary | — |
| Works with | iOS, Android | — |
Related comparisons
vs
Cellular Line BTIONWATCHPRORKvsColmi V75
vsBea-Fon Legion 3 Smartwatch 1,95" AMOLEDvsCellular Line BTIONWATCHPRORKvs
Cellular Line BTIONWATCHPRORKvsReflex Active Series 17 RA17-2164-TWSvs
Cellular Line BTIONWATCHPRORKvsRadley RYS08-2088
vs
Blackview W70 ProvsPeaq PSW 300vsBea-Fon Legion 3 Smartwatch 1,95" AMOLEDvsPeaq PSW 300