NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Nomad vs Pace 4 Aluminum

Coros Nomad vs Coros Pace 4 Aluminum

What Nomad does better (6) and where Pace 4 Aluminum wins (5) — every spec side by side.

Coros Nomad
Coros · 2025Nomad
5.3Score
6 advantages≈ $350
vs
Coros Pace 4 Aluminum
Coros · 2025Pace 4 Aluminum
6.1Score
5 advantages≈ $280
Higher score
3.8Display5.3
7.9Battery life7.1
4.9Health tracking4.9
5.2Sports & outdoor3.8
2.3Build & durability3.1
Dimensions

Size comparison

NomadPace 4 Aluminum
47.8 × 47.814.843.4 × 43.411.8
NomadPace 4 AluminumDifference
Height47.8 mm43.4 mm+4.4 mm
Width47.8 mm43.4 mm+4.4 mm
Thickness14.8 mm11.8 mm+3 mm
Weight61 g41 g+20 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Nomad better than Pace 4 Aluminum?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)22 days vs 19 days+16%
  2. GPS battery life50 h vs 41 h+22%
  3. Storage32 GB vs 4 GB8×
  4. Screen size1.3″ vs 1.2″+8%
  5. Sport profiles43 vs 28+54%
  6. GPS battery life (dual-band)34 h vs 31 h+10%

Why is Pace 4 Aluminum better than Nomad?

  1. AMOLED / OLED displayNo · Nomad: Yes
  2. Weight61 g vs 41 g+49%
  3. Pixel density200 ppi vs 325 ppi+62%
  4. Resolution (width)260 px vs 390 px+50%
  5. Thickness14.8 mm vs 11.8 mm+25%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare