NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Nomad vs Instinct 3 50mm AMOLED

Coros Nomad vs Garmin Instinct 3 50mm AMOLED

What Nomad does better (3) and where Instinct 3 50mm AMOLED wins (8) — every spec side by side.

Coros Nomad
Coros · 2025Nomad
5.3Score
3 advantages≈ $350
vs
Garmin Instinct 3 50mm AMOLED
7.5Score
8 advantages≈ $400
Higher score
3.8Display5.6
7.9Battery life7.3
4.9Health tracking4.9
5.2Sports & outdoor6.6
2.3Build & durability5.4
Dimensions

Size comparison

NomadInstinct 3 50mm AMOLED
47.8 × 47.814.850 × 5014.4
NomadInstinct 3 50mm AMOLEDDifference
Height47.8 mm50 mm−2.2 mm
Width47.8 mm50 mm−2.2 mm
Thickness14.8 mm14.4 mm+0.4 mm
Weight61 g59 g+2 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Nomad better than Instinct 3 50mm AMOLED?

  1. GPS battery life50 h vs 40 h+25%
  2. Storage32 GB vs 4 GB8×
  3. GPS battery life (dual-band)34 h vs 30 h+13%

Why is Instinct 3 50mm AMOLED better than Nomad?

  1. Water resistance5 ATM vs 10 ATM2×
  2. AMOLED / OLED displayNo · Nomad: Yes
  3. Battery life (smartwatch mode)22 days vs 24 days+9%
  4. Sport profiles43 vs 962.2×
  5. Weight61 g vs 59 g+3%
  6. Resolution (width)260 px vs 416 px+60%
  7. Pixel density200 ppi vs 320 ppi+60%
  8. Thickness14.8 mm vs 14.4 mm+3%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare