NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Pace Pro vs Approach S40

Coros Pace Pro vs Garmin Approach S40

What Pace Pro does better (7) and where Approach S40 wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Coros Pace Pro
5.9Score
7 advantages≈ $300
Higher score
vs
Garmin Approach S40
Garmin · 2019Approach S40
2 advantages≈ $300
7.0Battery life2.7
Dimensions

Size comparison

Pace ProApproach S40
46 × 4612.243.4 × 43.411.7
Pace ProApproach S40Difference
Height46 mm43.4 mm+2.6 mm
Width46 mm43.4 mm+2.6 mm
Thickness12.2 mm11.7 mm+0.6 mm
Weight49 g43 g+6 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Pace Pro better than Approach S40?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)20 days vs 10 days2×
  2. GPS battery life38 h vs 15 h2.5×
  3. Sport profiles28 vs 214×
  4. Storage32 GB vs 0.06 GB533.3×
  5. Screen size1.3″ vs 1.2″+8%
  6. Resolution (width)416 px vs 240 px+73%
  7. Pixel density320 ppi vs 200 ppi+60%

Why is Approach S40 better than Pace Pro?

  1. Weight49 g vs 43 g+14%
  2. Thickness12.2 mm vs 11.7 mm+5%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare