NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Pace Pro vs Approach S42

Coros Pace Pro vs Garmin Approach S42

What Pace Pro does better (8) and where Approach S42 wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Coros Pace Pro
5.9Score
8 advantages≈ $300
Higher score
vs
Garmin Approach S42
Garmin · 2021Approach S42
3.6Score
2 advantages≈ $300
5.0Display3.4
7.0Battery life2.7
2.7Build & durability2.9
Dimensions

Size comparison

Pace ProApproach S42
46 × 4612.243.4 × 43.411.7
Pace ProApproach S42Difference
Height46 mm43.4 mm+2.6 mm
Width46 mm43.4 mm+2.6 mm
Thickness12.2 mm11.7 mm+0.6 mm
Weight49 g43 g+6 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Pace Pro better than Approach S42?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)20 days vs 10 days2×
  2. GPS battery life38 h vs 15 h2.5×
  3. AMOLED / OLED displayYes · Approach S42: No
  4. Sport profiles28 vs 55.6×
  5. Storage32 GB vs 0.06 GB533.3×
  6. Screen size1.3″ vs 1.2″+8%
  7. Resolution (width)416 px vs 240 px+73%
  8. Pixel density320 ppi vs 200 ppi+60%

Why is Approach S42 better than Pace Pro?

  1. Weight49 g vs 43 g+14%
  2. Thickness12.2 mm vs 11.7 mm+5%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare