NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Pace Pro vs Forerunner 165

Coros Pace Pro vs Garmin Forerunner 165

What Pace Pro does better (6) and where Forerunner 165 wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Coros Pace Pro
5.9Score
6 advantages≈ $300
Higher score
vs
Garmin Forerunner 165
Garmin · 2024Forerunner 165
4.3Score
2 advantages≈ $250
5.0Display5.3
7.0Battery life3.1
4.9Health tracking4.9
3.8Sports & outdoor2.7
2.7Build & durability3.5
Dimensions

Size comparison

Pace ProForerunner 165
46 × 4612.243 × 4311.6
Pace ProForerunner 165Difference
Height46 mm43 mm+3 mm
Width46 mm43 mm+3 mm
Thickness12.2 mm11.6 mm+0.7 mm
Weight49 g39 g+10 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Pace Pro better than Forerunner 165?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)20 days vs 11 days+82%
  2. GPS battery life38 h vs 19 h2×
  3. Storage32 GB vs 4 GB8×
  4. Screen size1.3″ vs 1.2″+8%
  5. Sport profiles28 vs 25+12%
  6. Resolution (width)416 px vs 390 px+7%

Why is Forerunner 165 better than Pace Pro?

  1. Weight49 g vs 39 g+26%
  2. Thickness12.2 mm vs 11.6 mm+6%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare