NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Pace Pro vs Forerunner 170

Coros Pace Pro vs Garmin Forerunner 170

What Pace Pro does better (6) and where Forerunner 170 wins (3) — every spec side by side.

Coros Pace Pro
5.9Score
6 advantages≈ $300
Higher score
vs
Garmin Forerunner 170
Garmin · 2026Forerunner 170
4.3Score
3 advantages≈ $300
5.0Display5.3
7.0Battery life2.9
4.9Health tracking4.9
3.8Sports & outdoor4.7
2.7Build & durability3.1
Dimensions

Size comparison

Pace ProForerunner 170
46 × 4612.242.6 × 42.611.9
Pace ProForerunner 170Difference
Height46 mm42.6 mm+3.4 mm
Width46 mm42.6 mm+3.4 mm
Thickness12.2 mm11.9 mm+0.3 mm
Weight49 g41 g+8 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Pace Pro better than Forerunner 170?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)20 days vs 10 days2×
  2. GPS battery life38 h vs 20 h+90%
  3. Storage32 GB vs 4 GB8×
  4. Screen size1.3″ vs 1.2″+8%
  5. Battery life with always-on display6 days vs 4 days+50%
  6. Resolution (width)416 px vs 390 px+7%

Why is Forerunner 170 better than Pace Pro?

  1. Sport profiles28 vs 782.8×
  2. Weight49 g vs 41 g+20%
  3. Thickness12.2 mm vs 11.9 mm+3%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare