NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Pace Pro vs Forerunner 170 Music

Coros Pace Pro vs Garmin Forerunner 170 Music

What Pace Pro does better (6) and where Forerunner 170 Music wins (3) — every spec side by side.

Coros Pace Pro
5.9Score
6 advantages≈ $300
Higher score
vs
Garmin Forerunner 170 Music
Garmin · 2026Forerunner 170 Music
4.6Score
3 advantages≈ $350
5.0Display5.3
7.0Battery life2.9
4.9Health tracking4.9
3.8Sports & outdoor4.8
2.7Build & durability3.1
Dimensions

Size comparison

Pace ProForerunner 170 Music
46 × 4612.242.6 × 42.611.9
Pace ProForerunner 170 MusicDifference
Height46 mm42.6 mm+3.4 mm
Width46 mm42.6 mm+3.4 mm
Thickness12.2 mm11.9 mm+0.3 mm
Weight49 g41 g+8 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Pace Pro better than Forerunner 170 Music?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)20 days vs 10 days2×
  2. GPS battery life38 h vs 20 h+90%
  3. Storage32 GB vs 4 GB8×
  4. Screen size1.3″ vs 1.2″+8%
  5. Battery life with always-on display6 days vs 4 days+50%
  6. Resolution (width)416 px vs 390 px+7%

Why is Forerunner 170 Music better than Pace Pro?

  1. Sport profiles28 vs 792.8×
  2. Weight49 g vs 41 g+20%
  3. Thickness12.2 mm vs 11.9 mm+3%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare