NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Pace Pro vs Forerunner 255

Coros Pace Pro vs Garmin Forerunner 255

What Pace Pro does better (8) and where Forerunner 255 wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Coros Pace Pro
5.9Score
8 advantages≈ $300
Higher score
vs
Garmin Forerunner 255
Garmin · 2022Forerunner 255
4.2Score
1 advantage≈ $350
5.0Display3.5
7.0Battery life4.8
4.9Health tracking4.9
3.8Sports & outdoor5.0
2.7Build & durability2.7
Dimensions

Size comparison

Pace ProForerunner 255
46 × 4612.245.6 × 45.612.9
Pace ProForerunner 255Difference
Height46 mm45.6 mm+0.4 mm
Width46 mm45.6 mm+0.4 mm
Thickness12.2 mm12.9 mm−0.7 mm
Weight49 g49 g=

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Pace Pro better than Forerunner 255?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)20 days vs 14 days+43%
  2. AMOLED / OLED displayYes · Forerunner 255: No
  3. GPS battery life38 h vs 30 h+27%
  4. Storage32 GB vs 4 GB8×
  5. GPS battery life (dual-band)31 h vs 16 h+94%
  6. Resolution (width)416 px vs 260 px+60%
  7. Pixel density320 ppi vs 200 ppi+60%
  8. Thickness12.2 mm vs 12.9 mm+5%

Why is Forerunner 255 better than Pace Pro?

  1. Sport profiles28 vs 582.1×
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare