NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Pace Pro vs Forerunner 255S

Coros Pace Pro vs Garmin Forerunner 255S

What Pace Pro does better (8) and where Forerunner 255S wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Coros Pace Pro
5.9Score
8 advantages≈ $300
Higher score
vs
Garmin Forerunner 255S
Garmin · 2022Forerunner 255S
3.9Score
2 advantages≈ $350
5.0Display2.2
7.0Battery life3.7
4.9Health tracking4.9
3.8Sports & outdoor5.0
2.7Build & durability3.5
Dimensions

Size comparison

Pace ProForerunner 255S
46 × 4612.241 × 4112.4
Pace ProForerunner 255SDifference
Height46 mm41 mm+5 mm
Width46 mm41 mm+5 mm
Thickness12.2 mm12.4 mm−0.2 mm
Weight49 g39 g+10 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Pace Pro better than Forerunner 255S?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)20 days vs 12 days+67%
  2. AMOLED / OLED displayYes · Forerunner 255S: No
  3. GPS battery life38 h vs 26 h+46%
  4. Storage32 GB vs 4 GB8×
  5. GPS battery life (dual-band)31 h vs 13 h2.4×
  6. Screen size1.3″ vs 1.1″+18%
  7. Resolution (width)416 px vs 218 px+91%
  8. Pixel density320 ppi vs 198 ppi+62%

Why is Forerunner 255S better than Pace Pro?

  1. Weight49 g vs 39 g+26%
  2. Sport profiles28 vs 582.1×
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare