NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Pace Pro vs Pacer

Coros Pace Pro vs Polar Pacer

What Pace Pro does better (10) and where Pacer wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Coros Pace Pro
5.9Score
10 advantages≈ $300
Higher score
vs
Polar Pacer
Polar · 2022Pacer
3.7Score
2 advantages≈ $260
5.0Display2.3
7.0Battery life3.5
4.9Health tracking2.1
3.8Sports & outdoor2.0
2.7Build & durability4.3
Dimensions

Size comparison

Pace ProPacer
46 × 4612.245 × 4511.5
Pace ProPacerDifference
Height46 mm45 mm+1 mm
Width46 mm45 mm+1 mm
Thickness12.2 mm11.5 mm+0.8 mm
Weight49 g40 g+9 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Pace Pro better than Pacer?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)20 days vs 6.5 days3.1×
  2. AMOLED / OLED displayYes · Pacer: No
  3. Offline mapsYes · Pacer: No
  4. GPS battery life38 h vs 32 h+19%
  5. TouchscreenYes · Pacer: No
  6. Barometric altimeterYes · Pacer: No
  7. CompassYes · Pacer: No
  8. Screen size1.3″ vs 1.2″+8%
  9. Resolution (width)416 px vs 240 px+73%
  10. Pixel density320 ppi vs 200 ppi+60%

Why is Pacer better than Pace Pro?

  1. Weight49 g vs 40 g+23%
  2. Thickness12.2 mm vs 11.5 mm+7%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare