NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Pace Pro vs Vantage M

Coros Pace Pro vs Polar Vantage M

What Pace Pro does better (9) and where Vantage M wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Coros Pace Pro
5.9Score
9 advantages≈ $300
Higher score
vs
Polar Vantage M
Polar · 2019Vantage M
3.6Score
1 advantage≈ $300
5.0Display2.9
7.0Battery life2.4
4.9Health tracking2.1
3.8Sports & outdoor2.1
2.7Build & durability2.1
Dimensions

Size comparison

Pace ProVantage M
46 × 4612.246 × 4612.5
Pace ProVantage MDifference
Height46 mm46 mm=
Width46 mm46 mm=
Thickness12.2 mm12.5 mm−0.2 mm
Weight49 g45 g+4 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Pace Pro better than Vantage M?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)20 days vs 6 days3.3×
  2. AMOLED / OLED displayYes · Vantage M: No
  3. Offline mapsYes · Vantage M: No
  4. GPS battery life38 h vs 26 h+46%
  5. Water resistance5 ATM vs 3 ATM+67%
  6. Screen size1.3″ vs 1.2″+8%
  7. Resolution (width)416 px vs 239 px+74%
  8. Pixel density320 ppi vs 200 ppi+60%
  9. Thickness12.2 mm vs 12.5 mm+2%

Why is Vantage M better than Pace Pro?

  1. Weight49 g vs 45 g+9%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare