NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Pace Pro vs Run

Coros Pace Pro vs Suunto Run

What Pace Pro does better (4) and where Run wins (5) — every spec side by side.

Coros Pace Pro
5.9Score
4 advantages≈ $300
Higher score
vs
Suunto Run
Suunto · 2025Run
5.5Score
5 advantages≈ $190
5.0Display7.1
7.0Battery life4.5
4.9Health tracking4.9
3.8Sports & outdoor3.7
2.7Build & durability4.3
Dimensions

Size comparison

Pace ProRun
46 × 4612.246 × 4611.5
Pace ProRunDifference
Height46 mm46 mm=
Width46 mm46 mm=
Thickness12.2 mm11.5 mm+0.8 mm
Weight49 g36 g+13 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Pace Pro better than Run?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)20 days vs 12 days+67%
  2. GPS battery life38 h vs 30 h+27%
  3. Wi-FiWi-Fi 4 vs Wi-Fi 14×
  4. GPS battery life (dual-band)31 h vs 20 h+55%

Why is Run better than Pace Pro?

  1. Weight49 g vs 36 g+36%
  2. Sport profiles28 vs 32+14%
  3. Resolution (width)416 px vs 466 px+12%
  4. Pixel density320 ppi vs 353 ppi+10%
  5. Thickness12.2 mm vs 11.5 mm+7%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare