NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Pace Pro vs Run 2

Coros Pace Pro vs Suunto Run 2

What Pace Pro does better (5) and where Run 2 wins (4) — every spec side by side.

Coros Pace Pro
5.9Score
5 advantages≈ $300
Higher score
vs
Suunto Run 2
Suunto · 2026Run 2
5.4Score
4 advantages≈ $320
5.0Display7.1
7.0Battery life4.6
4.9Health tracking4.9
3.8Sports & outdoor4.5
2.7Build & durability4.1
Dimensions

Size comparison

Pace ProRun 2
46 × 4612.246.5 × 46.511.7
Pace ProRun 2Difference
Height46 mm46.5 mm−0.5 mm
Width46 mm46.5 mm−0.5 mm
Thickness12.2 mm11.7 mm+0.6 mm
Weight49 g53 g−4 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Pace Pro better than Run 2?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)20 days vs 12 days+67%
  2. GPS battery life38 h vs 30 h+27%
  3. Wi-FiWi-Fi 4 vs Wi-Fi 14×
  4. Weight49 g vs 53 g+8%
  5. GPS battery life (dual-band)31 h vs 24 h+29%

Why is Run 2 better than Pace Pro?

  1. Sport profiles28 vs 32+14%
  2. Resolution (width)416 px vs 466 px+12%
  3. Pixel density320 ppi vs 353 ppi+10%
  4. Thickness12.2 mm vs 11.7 mm+5%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare