NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Vertix 2S vs Fenix E 47mm AMOLED

Coros Vertix 2S vs Garmin Fenix E 47mm AMOLED

What Vertix 2S does better (5) and where Fenix E 47mm AMOLED wins (6) — every spec side by side.

Coros Vertix 2S
Coros · 2024Vertix 2S
8.4Score
5 advantages≈ $700
Higher score
vs
Garmin Fenix E 47mm AMOLED
Garmin · 2024Fenix E 47mm AMOLED
6.4Score
6 advantages≈ $800
4.4Display5.7
9.8Battery life6.7
4.9Health tracking4.9
5.2Sports & outdoor6.9
7.8Build & durability5.0
Dimensions

Size comparison

Vertix 2SFenix E 47mm AMOLED
50.3 × 50.31647 × 4714.5
Vertix 2SFenix E 47mm AMOLEDDifference
Height50.3 mm47 mm+3.3 mm
Width50.3 mm47 mm+3.3 mm
Thickness16 mm14.5 mm+1.5 mm
Weight87 g76 g+11 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Vertix 2S better than Fenix E 47mm AMOLED?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)36 days vs 16 days2.2×
  2. GPS battery life118 h vs 42 h2.8×
  3. Sapphire crystalYes · Fenix E 47mm AMOLED: No
  4. Storage32 GB vs 16 GB2×
  5. Screen size1.4″ vs 1.3″+8%

Why is Fenix E 47mm AMOLED better than Vertix 2S?

  1. AMOLED / OLED displayNo · Vertix 2S: Yes
  2. Sport profiles43 vs 972.3×
  3. Weight87 g vs 76 g+14%
  4. Pixel density200 ppi vs 320 ppi+60%
  5. Resolution (width)280 px vs 416 px+49%
  6. Thickness16 mm vs 14.5 mm+10%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare