4.3Display4.6
5.0Health tracking5.0
3.9Smart features3.9
Why is C29 better than Prowatch ZN?
- Screen size1.52″ vs 1.43″+6%
- Battery capacity410 mAh vs 350 mAh+17%
- Pixel density335 ppi vs 326 ppi+3%
Why is Prowatch ZN better than C29?
- AMOLED / OLED displayNo · C29: Yes
- Resolution (width)360 px vs 466 px+29%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Case size | 52 mm | — |
| Weight | 42.1 g | — |
| Thickness | 13.4 mm | — |
| Height | 51.9 mm | — |
| Width | 49.5 mm | — |
| Case material | Stainless steel | — |
| Lens / cover glass | — | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Water resistance | 1 ATM | — |
| Ingress protection | — | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx8 |
| Colours | Black | Black, Tarnish |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.52″ | 1.43″ |
| Display technology | LCD | AMOLED |
| Panel | TFT LCD | AMOLED |
| AMOLED / OLED display | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 360 px | 466 px |
| Resolution (height) | 360 px | 466 px |
| Pixel density | 335 ppi | 326 ppi |
| Peak brightness | — | 600 nits |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 410 mAh | 350 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Ion |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | Yes | Yes |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | Accelerometer, heart rate, SpO2, blood pressure | Accelerometer, heart rate, SpO2 |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| NFC payments | No | No |
| LTE (cellular) | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.2 |
| Smart features | ||
| Speaker | Yes | Yes |
| Platform | ||
| Operating system | Proprietary OS | Proprietary OS |
| Platform | Proprietary | Proprietary |
