NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. C3 vs Ignite

Cubot C3 vs Polar Ignite

What C3 does better (4) and where Ignite wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Cubot C3
Cubot · 2020C3
4.0Score
4 advantages
Higher score
vs
Polar Ignite
Polar · 2019Ignite
3.7Score
2 advantages≈ $220
2.2Display2.4
5.3Build & durability2.5
Dimensions

Size comparison

C3Ignite
46 × 4614.843 × 438.5
C3IgniteDifference
Height46 mm43 mm+3 mm
Width46 mm43 mm+3 mm
Thickness14.8 mm8.5 mm+6.3 mm

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is C3 better than Ignite?

  1. Water resistance5 ATM vs 3 ATM+67%
  2. Screen size1.3″ vs 1.2″+8%
  3. Battery capacity260 mAh vs 165 mAh+58%
  4. Pixel density261 ppi vs 200 ppi+30%

Why is Ignite better than C3?

  1. Built-in GPSNo · C3: Yes
  2. Thickness14.8 mm vs 8.5 mm+74%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare