NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. C7 vs E3

Cubot C7 vs Energizer E3

What C7 does better (4) and where E3 wins (3) — every spec side by side.

Cubot C7
Cubot · 2021C7
3.6Score
4 advantages
vs
Energizer E3
Energizer · 2021E3
3.8Score
3 advantages≈ $11
Higher score
2.7Display2.9
2.5Smart features3.9
Dimensions

Size comparison

C7E3
44 × 441248 × 113.914
C7E3Difference
Height44 mm113.9 mm−69.9 mm
Width44 mm48 mm−4 mm
Thickness12 mm14 mm−2 mm
Weight34 g70 g−36 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is C7 better than E3?

  1. Weight34 g vs 70 g2.1×
  2. Pixel density220 ppi vs 116 ppi+90%
  3. Resolution (width)240 px vs 128 px+88%
  4. Thickness12 mm vs 14 mm+17%

Why is E3 better than C7?

  1. Battery capacity260 mAh vs 1,000 mAh3.8×
  2. SpeakerNo · C7: Yes
  3. Screen size1.54″ vs 1.77″+15%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare