NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. GT3 vs iGo Watch 4! JW-600

Cubot GT3 vs Forever iGo Watch 4! JW-600

What GT3 does better (3) and where iGo Watch 4! JW-600 wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Cubot GT3
Cubot · 2025GT3
6.5Score
3 advantages
Higher score
vs
Forever iGo Watch 4! JW-600
Forever · 2025iGo Watch 4! JW-600
1 advantage≈ $40
9.8Display4.9
Dimensions

Size comparison

GT3iGo Watch 4! JW-600
48.2 × 59.313.410.6 × 46256
GT3iGo Watch 4! JW-600Difference
Height59.3 mm46 mm+13.3 mm
Width48.2 mm10.6 mm+37.6 mm
Thickness13.4 mm256 mm−242.6 mm
Weight57 g34 g+23 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is GT3 better than iGo Watch 4! JW-600?

  1. Screen size1.96″ vs 1.28″+53%
  2. Thickness13.4 mm vs 256 mm19.1×
  3. Battery capacity530 mAh vs 280 mAh+89%

Why is iGo Watch 4! JW-600 better than GT3?

  1. Weight57 g vs 33.9 g+68%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare