NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. GT3 vs Fenix 8 Pro 51mm MicroLED

Cubot GT3 vs Garmin Fenix 8 Pro 51mm MicroLED

What GT3 does better (4) and where Fenix 8 Pro 51mm MicroLED wins (4) — every spec side by side.

Cubot GT3
Cubot · 2025GT3
6.5Score
4 advantages
vs
Garmin Fenix 8 Pro 51mm MicroLED
7.3Score
4 advantages≈ $1,600
Higher score
9.8Display9.8
5.0Health tracking8.3
4.7Sports & outdoor8.2
3.9Smart features9.3
3.2Build & durability6.4
Dimensions

Size comparison

GT3Fenix 8 Pro 51mm MicroLED
48.2 × 59.313.451 × 5117.5
GT3Fenix 8 Pro 51mm MicroLEDDifference
Height59.3 mm51 mm+8.3 mm
Width48.2 mm51 mm−2.8 mm
Thickness13.4 mm17.5 mm−4.1 mm
Weight57 g93 g−36 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is GT3 better than Fenix 8 Pro 51mm MicroLED?

  1. Weight57 g vs 93 g+63%
  2. Screen size1.96″ vs 1.4″+40%
  3. Thickness13.4 mm vs 17.5 mm+31%
  4. Pixel density331 ppi vs 324 ppi+2%

Why is Fenix 8 Pro 51mm MicroLED better than GT3?

  1. Water resistance5 ATM vs 10 ATM2×
  2. NFC paymentsNo · GT3: Yes
  3. LTE (cellular)No · GT3: Yes
  4. Resolution (width)410 px vs 454 px+11%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare