NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. GT3 vs Vivoactive 6

Cubot GT3 vs Garmin Vivoactive 6

What GT3 does better (2) and where Vivoactive 6 wins (3) — every spec side by side.

Cubot GT3
Cubot · 2025GT3
6.5Score
2 advantages
vs
Garmin Vivoactive 6
Garmin · 2025Vivoactive 6
6.8Score
3 advantages≈ $300
Higher score
9.8Display4.8
5.0Health tracking5.0
4.7Sports & outdoor9.3
3.9Smart features7.3
3.2Build & durability3.6
Dimensions

Size comparison

GT3Vivoactive 6
48.2 × 59.313.442.2 × 42.210.9
GT3Vivoactive 6Difference
Height59.3 mm42.2 mm+17.1 mm
Width48.2 mm42.2 mm+6 mm
Thickness13.4 mm10.9 mm+2.5 mm
Weight57 g23 g+34 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is GT3 better than Vivoactive 6?

  1. Screen size1.96″ vs 1.2″+63%
  2. Resolution (width)410 px vs 390 px+5%

Why is Vivoactive 6 better than GT3?

  1. Weight57 g vs 23 g2.5×
  2. NFC paymentsNo · GT3: Yes
  3. Thickness13.4 mm vs 10.9 mm+23%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare