Dimensions
Size comparison
GT3100
| GT3 | 100 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 59.3 mm | 114.3 mm | −55 mm |
| Width | 48.2 mm | 50 mm | −1.8 mm |
| Thickness | 13.4 mm | 14.3 mm | −0.9 mm |
| Weight | 57 g | 73 g | −16 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is GT3 better than 100?
- Built-in GPSYes · 100: No
- AMOLED / OLED displayYes · 100: No
- Resolution (width)410 px vs 128 px3.2×
- Pixel density331 ppi vs 116 ppi2.9×
- Weight57 g vs 73 g+28%
- Screen size1.96″ vs 1.77″+11%
- Thickness13.4 mm vs 14.3 mm+7%
Why is 100 better than GT3?
- Battery capacity530 mAh vs 800 mAh+51%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Case size | 59 mm | — |
| Weight | 57 g | 73 g |
| Thickness | 13.4 mm | 14.3 mm |
| Height | 59.3 mm | 114.3 mm |
| Width | 48.2 mm | 50 mm |
| Water resistance | 5 ATM | — |
| Colours | Black, Gray | Gray, Red, Green |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.96″ | 1.77″ |
| Display technology | AMOLED | LCD |
| Panel | AMOLED | TFT |
| AMOLED / OLED display | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | 410 px | 128 px |
| Resolution (height) | 502 px | 160 px |
| Pixel density | 331 ppi | 116 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 530 mAh | 800 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Ion |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | Yes | — |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | Yes | — |
| Sensors | Accelerometer, gyro, barometer, compass, heart rate, SpO2 | — |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | Yes | No |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | — |
| Barometric altimeter | Yes | — |
| Compass | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| NFC payments | No | No |
| LTE (cellular) | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | — |
| Smart features | ||
| Speaker | Yes | Yes |
| Platform | ||
| Operating system | Proprietary OS | — |
| Platform | Proprietary | — |
| Chipset | — | Unisoc 6533G |
